PASTEXPERIENCE HISTORY

Honnō-ji. Edo. Pompeii. Where will you go?

Explore by place

1800–1821 · Surveying and completing maps

How were the Inō maps measured and made?

Measured routes, recorded bearings and observed stars lay behind a team’s mapping work.

Explore how it works

Turning measured routes into map lines

Is distance alone enough to plot the shape of a coast?

A coastal survey party records distance and bearing using measuring rope and a direction instrument.
01Measure on land
Distance measurementBearingField notebook

Joined segments reveal the route’s turns.

Distance needs direction

Record distance and bearing along a route. Equal distances in different directions lead to different places; successive measurements supply a map’s line.

Sources and scope

These illustrations explain processes and institutions rather than reconstructing actual people, buildings or layouts. Cutaways and insets show hidden structures or separate locations.

About Inō Tadataka ↗Inō maps ↗

Measure on land

100%

Scroll the enlarged image to inspect details.

A coastal survey party records distance and bearing using measuring rope and a direction instrument.

A coastal survey party records distance and bearing using measuring rope and a direction instrument.

From commerce to astronomy

Distance alone cannot position a winding coastline: bearings are also needed, and astronomical latitude supplied an additional check on accumulated measurements. Tadataka passed on his household in 1794, studied in Edo from the following year and began surveying Tōhoku and southern Hokkaidō in 1800. Mapping required connecting different observations as well as travelling far.

Distance and bearing relate successive points, but errors can accumulate. Astronomical observations supplied an additional positional reference such as latitude. Neither observing stars alone nor counting footsteps alone established all positions; the methods had complementary roles.

Measure, record and connect

Instruments, diaries and mapped results preserve different stages of teamwork. Measurements needed identification and comparison before becoming lines and shapes. Looking only at the final map hides that labour; examining the surviving materials together connects field procedures with compilation.

Tadataka did not participate personally in the Izu Islands expedition of 1815–1816. Teamwork and records continued beyond his presence. Distinguishing his route from the project’s coverage recognises collaboration without diminishing his contribution. A map’s familiar personal name does not identify one person as every worker.

Completion and survival after his death

Tadataka died in 1818 before completion in 1821. Compilation continued after fieldwork. Large, medium and small maps differ in scale and detail. Producing another scale is an editorial task, not simply displaying the same sheet at a smaller size.

The National Diet Library holds 43 sheets of an early Meiji copy of the 214-sheet large map. Survey coverage, the complete compilation and one institution’s surviving holdings are different matters. Dates of original compilation and later copying must be distinguished, extending the history into preservation and access.

Large, medium and small compilations had 214, eight and three sheets. Scale changes the relationship between detail and overview; survey subject, compilation and copying dates are also distinct.

Eastern coastal maps were submitted in 1804 before later regional surveys. Intermediate products and final compilation show staged expansion and continuity of records, not one journey inferred backward from the completed map.

Before and after

  1. 1795

    Tadataka studies under Yoshitoki in Edo.

  2. 1800

    The first survey begins.

  3. 1818

    Tadataka dies.

  4. 1821

    The completed maps are presented to the shogunate.

Key terms

Bearing
The direction of a route or target expressed as an angle.
Latitude
A measure of north–south position that can be checked astronomically.
Scale
The ratio between real distance and mapped distance.

What supports the account?

The maps were completed after Tadataka died.

Katori distinguishes death in 1818 from completion in 1821.

Limits of the evidence

Do not attribute all final compilation to one person.

Surviving maps include secondary and later copies.

The library explains the lost originals and surviving lineages.

Limits of the evidence

Do not automatically identify a surviving sheet as the presentation original.

Check your understanding

Choose an answer to reveal the explanation. Return to the article and sources when you are unsure.

1. Why add astronomical observations to recorded coastal distances and bearings?
Play a story set here4 chapters · Free

Sources

  1. Inō Tadataka and chronology香取市・伊能忠敬記念館

    Business, astronomy, the 1800 survey, death in 1818 and completion in 1821.

  2. Inō maps国立国会図書館

    Scales, coverage, lost originals and surviving secondary copies.

  3. Records and instruments of Inō Tadataka香取市

    Journals, instruments, astronomical observations and latitude.

  4. Inō museum newsletter 6香取市 伊能忠敬記念館

    The 1800 first expedition and its route through Tōhoku to Hokkaidō.

  5. Katori heritage archive 41–50香取市

    Study under Takahashi in Edo at fifty, surveys and the 1821 presentation.